Failed NAFTA claimants accuse Chilean arbitrator of pro-state bias

Failed NAFTA claimants accuse Chilean arbitrator of pro-state bias

A group of US oil services investors whose US$270 million NAFTA claim against Mexico was thrown out earlier this year are arguing the award should be set aside because their own appointed arbitrator – Chile’s Andrés Jana – failed to disclose his counsel work for states in various investment arbitrations. 

Unlock unlimited access to all Global Arbitration Review content