The pandemic curfew problem
A deserted Leicester Square in London in April 2020 during the coronavirus lockdown (Credit: Shutterstock/Jam Travels)
A panel at the ASIL annual meeting simulated oral argument on whether a BIT’s public health and essential security interests clause provides a defence to treaty claims arising out of pandemic curfews, and whether such an exception can deprive a tribunal of jurisdiction. Ina Popova and Alma Mozetič, partner and associate at Debevoise & Plimpton, report.
To read more
Subscribe to Global Arbitration Review
Register for limited access
Register for free to receive GAR’s daily briefing and access to GAR 100.
Register now
Subscribe to unlock unlimited access
Get news, unique commentary, expert analysis and essential resources from the Global Arbitration Review experts.
Subscribe now